On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:57:57AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote: > Le 2014-04-28 18:43, Kenneth Westerback a écrit : > > Why is the burden on everyone to provide 'valid' objections? > > I know that what I proposed cannot go in at the moment. It's my end > goal. Now what I want is to have a clear picture of what the issues are, > and whether there's anything I can do to help fix them. I'm not putting > the burden on anyone except myself. > > > Given the miniscule IPv6 usage out there, why should IPv6 come first? > > I don't see how "usage" is relevant. If IPv6 provided 1000% performance > improvement with no downsides, we would want to use it even if global > usage was low.
The problem is that IPv6 is tunnels all the way down (at least in many locations) and has more delay. At the moment it is not even equal to the IPv4 performance so why should we force it on everyone using OpenBSD on this planet? At the moment people that want to taste the new and improved taste of IPv6 should edit resolv.conf or resolv.conf.tail to change the order. -- :wq Claudio
