Hi, just to make things clear, I have no strong opinion towards Philip's proposal. I merely had kept __BSD_VISIBLE mostly because those functions had appeared in BSD before they were standardized. Updated diff, reversing the order of the tests, but not (yet?) suppressing the __BSD_VISIBLE case.
I've been sitting on this for too long, it would be a shame if the discussion stalled because of a "detail". :) Index: stat.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/stat.h,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -p -p -u -r1.27 stat.h --- stat.h 8 Dec 2014 20:56:11 -0000 1.27 +++ stat.h 4 Apr 2015 17:16:27 -0000 @@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ int mkdir(const char *, mode_t); int mkfifo(const char *, mode_t); int stat(const char *, struct stat *); mode_t umask(mode_t); +#if __POSIX_VISIBLE >= 200112L || __XPG_VISIBLE >= 420 || __BSD_VISIBLE +int fchmod(int, mode_t); +int lstat(const char *, struct stat *); +#endif #if __POSIX_VISIBLE >= 200809 int fchmodat(int, const char *, mode_t, int); int fstatat(int, const char *, struct stat *, int); @@ -211,8 +215,6 @@ int futimens(int, const struct timespec int chflags(const char *, unsigned int); int chflagsat(int, const char *, unsigned int, int); int fchflags(int, unsigned int); -int fchmod(int, mode_t); -int lstat(const char *, struct stat *); int isfdtype(int, int); #endif __END_DECLS -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
