On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas <[email protected]> wrote: > just to make things clear, I have no strong opinion towards Philip's > proposal. I merely had kept __BSD_VISIBLE mostly because those > functions had appeared in BSD before they were standardized. Updated > diff, reversing the order of the tests, but not (yet?) suppressing the > __BSD_VISIBLE case. > > I've been sitting on this for too long, it would be a shame if the > discussion stalled because of a "detail". :)
Sure, get it in. I'll run my crusade when todd's busy elsewhere... hehehhe
