On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:51:22AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > Marcus Glocker wrote: > > Me too. Would it be ok to merge utvfu.c and utvfu_ops.c by including > > both Copyrights in this file? Should it be > > > > [Copyright 1] > > [Code 1] > > [Copyright 2] > > [Code 2] > > > > or > > > > [Copyright 1] > > [Copyright 2] > > [Code 1] > > [Code 2] > > > > Historically, the second has been popular, but that's also when the new code > is > mixed in with old. > > If it's entirely new code, I think the top option is better because it allows > separation later. We have some files where all the [code 1] gets deleted, but > the copyright remains, somewhat dubious.
Thanks for the feedback Ted. I guess in this case we should go with option 1 then. Patrick, can you please merge utvfu_ops.c into utvfu.c in your new diff this way?
