On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:23:53AM -0500, joshua stein wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 at 07:22:14 +0200, Joerg Jung wrote: > > > We should not get hung up too much about the driver name. If it is > > > felt that efifb(4) is inappropriate for these chromebooks with > > > coreboot, we can always rename the driver. > > > > Yes, renaming makes sense then. > > Any ideas for a new name?
NetBSD calls their equivalent driver genfb(4).
