On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:32:00PM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:23:53AM -0500, joshua stein wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 at 07:22:14 +0200, Joerg Jung wrote: > > > > We should not get hung up too much about the driver name. If it is > > > > felt that efifb(4) is inappropriate for these chromebooks with > > > > coreboot, we can always rename the driver. > > > > > > Yes, renaming makes sense then. > > > > Any ideas for a new name? > > NetBSD calls their equivalent driver genfb(4).
I wonder if it could be called wsfb(4) to match the X driver, or some variation on that to avoid the man page conflict.
