li...@wrant.com writes: > Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:54:33 +0000 Robert Peichaer <rob...@peichaer.org> >> > Hi tech@, >> > >> > Daemon names historically match Antoine's alphanumeric proposal, and I >> > think underscore is a bit too much, if it's present use minus instead. >> > The logic behind this? Match this to word termination symbols in ksh. >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Anton >> >> $ find /usr/ports -name '*_*.rc' -type f | wc -l >> 85 > > Hi Robert, > > I'll not be arguing about this, from usability end point the underscore > is pretty bad especially if you want to go back word at a time. If you > think the underscore is enough, I agree yet I would still prefer minus, > where we have variation & need to go back to the differentiation point.
On such a trivial subject, you suggest costly changes to existing practices, just to please your preferences. Of course, without even publishing a possible implementation. I'd find it funny, if only you were not wasting the time of the folks on this mailing-list. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
