li...@wrant.com writes: > Tue, 06 Sep 2016 22:41:53 +0200 Jeremie Courreges-Anglas > <j...@wxcvbn.org> >> li...@wrant.com writes: >> >> > Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:54:33 +0000 Robert Peichaer <rob...@peichaer.org> >> >> > Hi tech@, >> >> > >> >> > Daemon names historically match Antoine's alphanumeric proposal, and I >> >> > think underscore is a bit too much, if it's present use minus instead. >> >> > The logic behind this? Match this to word termination symbols in ksh. >> >> > >> >> > Kind regards, >> >> > Anton >> >> >> >> $ find /usr/ports -name '*_*.rc' -type f | wc -l >> >> 85 >> > >> > Hi Robert, >> > >> > I'll not be arguing about this, from usability end point the underscore >> > is pretty bad especially if you want to go back word at a time. If you >> > think the underscore is enough, I agree yet I would still prefer minus, >> > where we have variation & need to go back to the differentiation point. >> >> On such a trivial subject, you suggest costly changes to existing >> practices, just to please your preferences. Of course, without even >> publishing a possible implementation. > > Hi Jeremie, > > Could you, please just fix the word delimiters in ksh(1) no?
So instead of changing existing, documented practice about $a to please your preferences, we should fix existing, documented practice within $b to match your preferences. And you still haven't dedicated a single minute to actual contribution attempts. Your recklessness is an insult. Please just leave this mailing-list already. > Then this > costly change is further not acceptable and I merely mentioned it, only > to selfishly please my preferences, sorry for the noise and time waste. The way I read it: "I find it funny that you're still reading the meaningless chatter I write, sorry for the noise and time waste." -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
