Hrvoje Popovski(hrv...@srce.hr) on 2016.12.21 22:03:56 +0100: > On 17.12.2016. 14:05, Peter Hessler wrote: > > Updated output, requested by Theo. A normal get will show just the bfd > > state, use "-bfd" to get all of the information. > > > > OK? > > > > $ route -n get 203.0.113.9 > > route to: 203.0.113.9 > > destination: 203.0.113.9 > > mask: 255.255.255.255 > > interface: em1 > > if address: 203.0.113.1 > > priority: 4 (connected) > > flags: <UP,HOST,DONE,LLINFO,CLONED,BFD> > > BFD: async state up remote up > > use mtu expire > > 83924 0 133 > > sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA> > > > > $ route -n get 203.0.113.9 -bfd > > route to: 203.0.113.9 > > destination: 203.0.113.9 > > mask: 255.255.255.255 > > interface: em1 > > if address: 203.0.113.1 > > priority: 4 (connected) > > flags: <UP,HOST,DONE,LLINFO,CLONED,BFD> > > BFD: async state up remote up laststate down error 0 > > diag none remote neighbor-down > > discr 186919089 remote 55 > > uptime 05d 2h07m29s > > mintx 1000000 minrx 1000000 minecho 0 multiplier 3 > > use mtu expire > > 83923 0 229 > > sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA> > > > Hi, > > it seems that bfd is working with Force10 S4810 and Extreme Networks > x460 switches. I can test it with cisco c6k5 if you want?
Hei, i'm sure phessler (who might not read this for a couple of days) is happy about any test you can do. And thanks for doing these tests! /Benno
