On 23.12.2016. 16:57, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 21.12.2016. 23:15, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it seems that bfd is working with Force10 S4810 and Extreme Networks
>>> x460 switches. I can test it with cisco c6k5 if you want?
>>
>> Hei,
>>
>> i'm sure phessler (who might not read this for a couple of days) is happy
>> about any test you can do.
>>
>> And thanks for doing these tests!
>>
>> /Benno
>
> Hi,
>
> no bfd for me on Cisco c6k5. Will upgrade and report back.
>
> Tnx for bfd, really great feature ...
>
>
Hi all,
at last i upgrade c6k5 and bfd is working
openbsd - 192.168.112.1
# route -n get 192.168.112.2 -bfd
route to: 192.168.112.2
destination: 192.168.112.2
mask: 255.255.255.255
interface: ix1
if address: 192.168.112.1
priority: 3 ()
flags: <UP,HOST,DONE,LLINFO,CLONED,CACHED,BFD>
BFD: async state up remote up laststate down error 0
diag none remote none
discr 2428102669 remote 1
uptime 34s last state time 26m30s
mintx 750000 minrx 750000 minecho 0 multiplier 3
use mtu expire
55 0 626
sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA>
c6k5 - 192.168.112.2
c6k5#sh bfd neighbors details
IPv4 Sessions
NeighAddr LD/RD RH/RS State Int
192.168.112.1 1/2428102669 Up Up
Gi6/1
Session state is UP and not using echo function.
Session Host: Software
OurAddr: 192.168.112.2
Handle: 1
Local Diag: 0, Demand mode: 0, Poll bit: 1
MinTxInt: 750000, MinRxInt: 750000, Multiplier: 3
Received MinRxInt: 750000, Received Multiplier: 3
Holddown (hits): 2436(0), Hello (hits): 750(185)
Rx Count: 205, Rx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 520/840/595 last: 564 ms ago
Tx Count: 186, Tx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 568/752/661 last: 388 ms ago
Elapsed time watermarks: 0 0 (last: 0)
Registered protocols: IPv4 Static CEF
Uptime: 00:02:02
Last packet: Version: 1 - Diagnostic: 0
State bit: Up - Demand bit: 0
Poll bit: 0 - Final bit: 0
C bit: 0
Multiplier: 3 - Length: 24
My Discr.: 2428102669 - Your Discr.: 1
Min tx interval: 750000 - Min rx interval: 750000
Min Echo interval: 0
