On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 08:17:42PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> We've been avoiding polluting services with absolutely every joke
> of a service. If we added everything, it would be a disaster that
> we have to manage and we don't want to.
Ok, no problem, yet asking again, now with some maintenance included.
> You've hit on one of the two services we've watched over the years
> as markers between "registered" and "not registered".
Then how about under unofficials?
> Have you found an application which does not know to use this
No, just netstat.
> As for what netstat reports, you big boys can handle that being
> just a number. That's why it prints numbers instead of blank space.
been over 20years since i first connected to irc, and it was on 6667.
i never knew about port 194, but am very sure it will never listen on udp.
so i think those two should go, even if latter won't get in.
slightly tested diff below; no vax was punished by the growth of services.
diff --git a/etc/services b/etc/services
index ceb2b58c17d..172db3609f3 100644
@@ -103,8 +103,6 @@ bgp 179/tcp # Border
prospero 191/tcp # Cliff Neuman's Prospero
-irc 194/tcp # Internet Relay Chat
smux 199/tcp # SNMP Unix Multiplexer
at-rtmp 201/tcp # AppleTalk routing
@@ -321,6 +319,8 @@ webster 2627/tcp #
conserver 3109/tcp # console server
canna 5680/tcp # Kana->Kanji server
sane-port 6566/tcp # SANE Control Port
+irc 6667/tcp # Internet Relay Chat
+irc 6697/tcp # IRC over SSL
icb 7326/tcp # Internet Citizen's Band
spamd 8025/tcp # spamd(8)
spamd-sync 8025/udp # spamd(8) synchronisation