On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 22:06:37 +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I've had something like this on my to-do list for some time and
> eventually dropped it because I couldn't think of a compelling use
> "Maybe Skip SHA-3"
That makes a pretty convincing case for *not* inluding sha-3.
I think at this point there needs to be a compelling argument to
include it in libc. As you say, it is not even present in LibreSSL,
though OpenSSL did eventually add it.