On 2018/01/19 15:07, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:15:41PM -0500, Lawrence Teo wrote: > > Nothing uses PF_TRANS_ALTQ anymore, so zap it. > > > > ok? > > I'm fine with removing it. I'm just concerned about potential impact > on port tree as there might be some tool/library still trying to use > PF_TRANS_ALTQ. I just don't know.
I'm doing a search for PF_TRANS_ALTQ or PF_TRANS_TABLE now. (Anything using the latter needs to be forced to udpate if the enum changes). Results in a bit. It will cause some pain for https://github.com/dotpy/py-pf/ (not in ports..) To be honest though, unless it's in the way of something, I'm not sure it's worth removing.
