On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:18:08PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 08:24:23PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > To be honest though, unless it's in the way of something, I'm not sure > > > > it's > > > > worth removing. > > > > > > If those constatns are in ports and require revision bumps, we can > > > leave it in the header. Rebuilding base is one thing, but doing > > > manual work with ports is not worth it. > > > > This seems overblown. > > > > The PF API is frozen. > > > > It is only an ABI between the kernel and pfctl -- that is the sticky > > and tricky upgrade position. Everything else can must be able to > > handle change. > > > I meant to say: the PF API is *NOT* frozen. We can change it at any time! > > It is just a tiny bit uncomfortable to incompatibly change the bsd:pfctl > interface. The timing just has to be right. > > ports? Who cares!
Thank you all for the feedback, and thanks sthen@ for searching the ports tree. I will coordinate with Theo regarding a suitable time to commit this.
