> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 08:24:23PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > To be honest though, unless it's in the way of something, I'm not sure it's > > worth removing. > > If those constatns are in ports and require revision bumps, we can > leave it in the header. Rebuilding base is one thing, but doing > manual work with ports is not worth it.
This seems overblown. The PF API is frozen. It is only an ABI between the kernel and pfctl -- that is the sticky and tricky upgrade position. Everything else can must be able to handle change.
