On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 04:32:24PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> That's a good point about -f. I was thinking . is similar to how
> it looks in -f output, but really the "."s build up when there are no
> replies and it prints a backspace for a received response.
> I've had offlist replies in favour of both directions but let's
> go with the same polarity as junos/cisco.
> 
> Any OKs?
OK kn

Reply via email to