Hi Gordon

You were taught Braille in the same era as myself, and with the same logic
at the time.  They claim now though to have these daft changes in place so
that it is easier with Braille translation software to have a unified code.
I don't get it personally, but there you go!


Kind regards,

Jackie Brown
Twitter: @thebrownsplace
Skype: Thejackmate

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gordon Smith
Sent: 15 November 2013 22:22
To: Techno-Chat ... Technology Enthusiasm!
Subject: Re: Braille

Hi Mary

I wish we had the backbone to maintain our own individuality in these
things.  RNIB just seems to go down on its benders when people come up with
these crazy suggestions.  Personally I don't see what's really been gained
by the adoption of UEB.  In many respects it just creates more work because
writing using UEB does away with some of the established rules we knew in
grade 2 (contracted) Braille.  Somebody once estimated that it would add an
average of an extra volume to a 4-volume book.  I thick that's a gross
over-estimate.  But maybe 10 or so pages would be more accurate.

But I'll give you an idea of the kind of rules which have changed since I
learned Braille way back in the swinging' sixties.

When you write a word such as "Appear", it was a consistent rule that you
would always use the contraction which represented the letters which came
first in the word.  So, using that example, the word "Appear" would have
been written as "A", "p", "p", "E A" sign, "R".  Today, that same word would
be written as "A", "p", "p", "e", "a r" sign.

Now, the difference may seem churlish to some.  But on a broader scale, it's
quite a shift in policy.  Indeed, it changes much of the linguistic code we
were used too and I have no idea why it was changed.  To what purpose?  WAs
it the usual one, I wonder, to bring us into line with the US?  No offence
indented towards anybody in the US.  But why must we always follow what the
US does?  Are our law-makers just as much poodles as our politicians are?

Kind regards

<--- Gordon Smith --->

<[email protected]>

Information Technology Accessibility Consultant;
Providing Help & Support To Young People LivingWith Visual Impairment, plus
Braille Transcription services.

On 11 Nov 2013, at 14:06, Stores, Mary A. <[email protected]> wrote:

The USD adopted the UEB last November, but they are keeping Nemeth Code
because, they say, it expresses Math better. So I think the differences in
math will still be an issue.


=======================================

The Techno-Chat E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus
and worm-free

To modify your subscription options, please visit for forum's dedicated web
pages located at
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/techno-chat

You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Techno-Chat group at
either of the following websites:

http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/techno-chat/index.html

Or:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>

---------------------------------------


=======================================

The Techno-Chat E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and 
worm-free

To modify your subscription options, please visit for forum's dedicated web 
pages located at
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/techno-chat

You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Techno-Chat group at 
either of the following websites:

http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/techno-chat/index.html

Or:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>

---------------------------------------

Reply via email to