======================================= The Techno-Chat E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and worm-free To modify your subscription options, please visit for forum's dedicated web pages located at http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/techno-chat You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Techno-Chat group at either of the following websites: http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/techno-chat/index.html Or: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> you may also subscribe to this list via RSS. The feed is at: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml> ---------------------------------------
My understanding of the english vs. american braille is that your
system uses the first possible contraction, regardless of where it
falls in the word. So, as you said, appear would have the ea symbol,
followed by the r. American braille doesn't break up sylabols,
(though that doesn't hold in your example) but we'd use the ar symbol
as you pointed out.
Unfortunately, I'm coming up blank on examples of english vs american
braille for cross sylable splits, but I do remember seeing them when I
read a book written in english braille many many years ago, and it
confused me quite a bit until I got used to it. :)
I haven't read the specs for this universal braille yet, so can't
comment on how it's doing things, but my understanding was that they
wanted a single code to replace all the various systems, computer,
nemeth, english, american, and foreign languages. I'm not sure
they've managed to cover all of those basis, especially since the
whole computer braille code was specifically designed to be an exact 1
for 1 match for the ascii character set, and nemeth has it's own way
of doing things, but if they've managed to pull it off, I'd be
surprised. Are they planning next to unify the written alphabet as
well, so russian, chineese, arabic and african languages all use the
same set of symbols? It's silly to contemplate such a thing, because
each language has symbols denoting sounds in that particular
language. I submit braille codes served the same purpose, and except
for the english vs american codes, I don't understand how they plan to
squeeze all the others into a single unified code. It's specifically
because each code was designed for something different that made them
the way they were, and throwing that all away, just because someone
somewhere didn't like learning different codes seems silly to me, but
then again, except for a short survey I participated in a couple years
ago, nobody asked my opinion about it all, so what's a person to do?
- RE: Braille Stores, Mary A.
- RE: Braille Stores, Mary A.
- Re: Braille Gordon Smith
- RE: Braille Jackie Brown
- Re: Braille Gordon Smith
- RE: Braille Jackie Brown
- Re: Braille Gordon Smith
- Re: Braille Travis Siegel
- Re: Braille Sarah k Alawami
- Re: Braille Gordon Smith
