Don’t forget IPA. I have an article on IPA and how it is done in braille. I 
hope that won’t change should I need to one day do IPA in braille.  For those 
that want to know what IPA is look up the international  phonetic alphabet. It 
has helped my own diction a lot.

Tc all.
On Nov 18, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Travis Siegel <[email protected]> wrote:

> My understanding of the english vs. american braille is that your system uses 
> the first possible contraction, regardless of where it falls in the word.  
> So, as you said, appear would have the ea symbol, followed by the r.  
> American braille doesn't break up sylabols, (though that doesn't hold in your 
> example) but we'd use the ar symbol as you pointed out.
> Unfortunately, I'm coming up blank on examples of english vs american braille 
> for cross sylable splits, but I do remember seeing them when I read a book 
> written in english braille many many years ago, and it confused me quite a 
> bit until I got used to it. :)
> I haven't read the specs for this universal braille yet, so can't comment on 
> how it's doing things, but my understanding was that they wanted a single 
> code to replace all the various systems, computer, nemeth, english, american, 
> and foreign languages.  I'm not sure they've managed to cover all of those 
> basis, especially since the whole computer braille code was specifically 
> designed to be an exact 1 for 1 match for the ascii character set, and nemeth 
> has it's own way of doing things, but if they've managed to pull it off, I'd 
> be surprised.  Are they planning next to unify the written alphabet as well, 
> so russian, chineese, arabic and african languages all use the same set of 
> symbols?  It's silly to contemplate such a thing, because each language has 
> symbols denoting sounds in that particular language.  I submit braille codes 
> served the same purpose, and except for the english vs american codes, I 
> don't understand how they plan to squeeze all the others into a single 
> unified code.  It's specifically because each code was designed for something 
> different that made them the way they were, and throwing that all away, just 
> because someone somewhere didn't like learning different codes seems silly to 
> me, but then again, except for a short survey I participated in a couple 
> years ago, nobody asked my opinion about it all, so what's a person to do?
> 
> 
> =======================================
> 
> The Techno-Chat E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus 
> and worm-free
> 
> To modify your subscription options, please visit for forum's dedicated web 
> pages located at
> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/techno-chat
> 
> You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Techno-Chat group at 
> either of the following websites:
> 
> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/techno-chat/index.html
> 
> Or:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
> you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>
> 
> ---------------------------------------


=======================================

The Techno-Chat E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and 
worm-free

To modify your subscription options, please visit for forum's dedicated web 
pages located at
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/techno-chat

You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Techno-Chat group at 
either of the following websites:

http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/techno-chat/index.html

Or:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>

---------------------------------------

Reply via email to