http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/business/yourmoney/22digi.html

October 22, 2006
Digital Domain
It’s Not the People You Know. It’s Where You Are.
By RANDALL STROSS

FIBER networks cross the world. Data bits move at light speed. The  
globe has been flattened, and national boundaries obliterated. Yet in  
Silicon Valley, the one place that is responsible more than any other  
for creating the network technology that supposedly renders geography  
irrelevant, physical distance is very much on the minds of the  
investors who provide venture capital.

Meet the “20-minute rule” that guides fateful decisions in Silicon  
Valley. Craig Johnson, managing director of Concept2Company Ventures,  
a venture capital firm in Palo Alto, Calif., who has 30 years of  
experience in early-stage financings, said he knew many venture  
capitalists who adhered to this doctrine: if a start-up company  
seeking venture capital is not within a 20-minute drive of the  
venture firm’s offices, it will not be funded.

Mr. Johnson explained that close proximity permits the investor to  
provide in-person guidance; initially, that may entail many meetings  
each week before investor and entrepreneur come to know each other  
well enough to rely mostly on the phone for updates. Those initial  
interactions are fateful. “Starting a company is like launching a  
rocket,” Mr. Johnson said. “If you’re a tenth of a degree off at  
launch, you may be 1,000 miles off downrange.”

Capital and attention are lavished on entrepreneurs in the Valley as  
in no other place. Ten years ago, when Dow Jones VentureOne began a  
quarterly survey of where venture investments landed, one-third of  
all deals in the country went to the San Francisco Bay Area. Since  
then, the same share of deals has gone to the same place, almost  
without variation. Most recently, in the first six months of this  
year, Silicon Valley still pulled in 32 percent; the region with the  
second-largest total, New England, was far behind, at 10 percent.

The latest wave of innovation, embodied in Web 2.0 companies, is  
centered in Silicon Valley. Joshua Grove, a research analyst at  
VentureOne, said that 43 percent of Web 2.0 deals this year were in  
the Bay Area, the formal category for the Valley. These included  
three of the four largest financings: the $25 million that went to  
Facebook, $14.5 million to Zimbra and $12 million to Six Apart.

How well is the Valley doing in incubating this newest crop of start- 
ups? Ask the investors at YouTube, who are celebrating Google’s $1.65  
billion deal for a company that was all of 19 months old. Or look at  
Google’s own record of growth: building a market capitalization of  
$141 billion in only eight years.

YouTube and Google share the same source of venture financing:  
Sequoia Capital, situated among the venture capital firms clustered  
in a handful of blocks in office parks along Sand Hill Road in Menlo  
Park, near the Stanford campus. Google’s other source of venture  
capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, is nearby, too.

Why so many of these firms, which form the world’s most concentrated  
source of capital for new ventures, originally collected in that  
particular spot, rather than, say, outside the Massachusetts  
Institute of Technology or the California Institute of Technology, is  
not important; what is important is that this is where they happen to  
be today.

Sequoia makes its preference for the 20-minute rule almost explicit,  
telling applicants whose companies are at the “seed stage” (receiving  
less than $1 million) or “early stage” ($1 million to $10 million)  
that “it is helpful if the company is close to our offices” because  
they “require very frequent contact.”

Kleiner Perkins has only one office, the one in Menlo Park. Sequoia  
has reached out to entrepreneurs more considerately, providing five  
offices. But only one of the five, the one in Menlo Park, is in the  
United States. The others are in China (two), India and Israel.

If you have a brilliant idea for the New New Thing and want Sequoia  
to provide its funds and blessing — using the same golden touch  
provided not long ago to Google’s founders — you would be much better  
off in Beijing, where Sequoia has an office, than in Boston, where it  
does not.

It’s convenient for venture capitalists to have entrepreneurs close  
by, but the reverse is true, too, said Allen Morgan, a managing  
director of the Mayfield Fund, which manages $2.3 billion in venture  
capital and is also on Sand Hill Road. Mr. Morgan made the case by  
pointing out that a prospective entrepreneur would, on average, need  
to have three to eight meetings with a venture fund before he or she  
was successful, but would have to go through a similar process with 5  
to 10 firms before finding the one that approved the funding request.

Even if the process goes smoothly and requires only 15 meetings — the  
fewest possible, given the lowest range of possibilities — and even  
if most of those meetings are set up in advance, the time consumed in  
getting to Sand Hill Road, even using local highways, can be  
significant. The problem is that much worse when, as often happens, a  
meeting is called with just an hour or two of notice. “If you live in  
Santa Clara, it’s doable,” Mr. Morgan said. “If you live in Dubuque,  
it’s not.”

Entrepreneurs who live in Silicon Valley also find the technical  
talent they need faster than they can in any other place; they pay  
more for that talent, but speed is the sine qua non for success. Seth  
J. Sternberg, the chief executive of Meebo, an instant-messaging  
company in Palo Alto that is backed by Sequoia, described Silicon  
Valley with the fervent appreciation of a recent transplant from New  
York, where he had suffered three separate bad experiences with start- 
ups, none of which had attracted venture funding.

The ecosystem in Silicon Valley, Mr. Sternberg said, includes  
“incredible techies, who live here because this is the epicenter,  
where they can find the most interesting projects to work on.” The  
ecosystem also includes real estate agents, accountants, head hunters  
and lawyers who understand an entrepreneur’s situation — that is,  
emptied bank accounts and maxed-out credit cards.

“In New York, it would be extremely difficult to find a law firm  
willing to defer the first $20,000 of your legal fees,” Mr. Sternberg  
said. “Here, we got that. It’s a pretty standard thing in Silicon  
Valley.”

On the East Coast, a business plan contest at the Harvard Business  
School in 2004 prompted one M.B.A. graduate, Arijit Sengupta, to  
found BeyondCore, a software company, in his apartment in Boston. Mr.  
Sengupta, who earlier had earned a bachelor’s degree in computer  
science and economics at Stanford, was determined to develop a  
finished product and to acquire customers by the oldest method of  
all: bootstrapping, or starting a business without outside capital.

He did end up needing Silicon Valley for something else: technical  
talent that would be willing to accept equity in place of any salary.  
Six weeks ago, he moved to Silicon Valley to recruit more people like  
his chief technical officer, who has been working full time since  
Jan. 1 for equity only.

“Elsewhere, if people in a large organization think you have  
potential, they offer you a job, trying to save you from the  
uncertainties of a start-up,” said Mr. Sengupta, who himself has  
worked at Oracle, Microsoft and General Motors. “In Silicon Valley,  
they say, ‘Can I join you?’ ”

Mr. Sengupta now has six “employees” working for BeyondCore without  
salaries. Only in Silicon Valley, he said, do “people have confidence  
that if you act on great ideas, the money will come.”

Predictions of the Valley’s demise have become a perennial, said Mr.  
Morgan, the Mayfield venture capitalist. “Every five years, Time or  
Newsweek runs a story: ‘Silicon Valley is Dead,’ ” he said. “But  
Silicon Valley is bigger and more vibrant and better at creating  
companies than it has ever been.”

Silicon Valley is not “bigger” in a literal sense. In fact, it  
remains geographically contained by the Santa Cruz Mountains on one  
side and San Francisco Bay on the other. The physical features of the  
place help explain the Valley’s vitality.

MR. JOHNSON, the venture capitalist in Palo Alto, noted that the  
greater Los Angeles area also has a pool of talented engineers  
(working at aerospace companies like Lockheed, Northrop and Hughes)  
and great universities (notably Caltech and U.C.L.A.) and plenty of  
money to invest. “But in Los Angeles,” he said, “people are scattered  
across a wide area; everything is more spread out.”

It’s harder for entrepreneurs to meet with one another and with  
investors, he added. And that means connections take longer, deals  
move slowly, fewer companies are formed. “Like a gas,  
entrepreneurship is hotter when compressed.” he said.

Why, one might ask, must relationships be built only by physical  
presence? Why, if the phone does not serve well, cannot the newest  
generation of videoconferencing gear — which provides stunning video  
to accompany sound — save the various participants from the vexations  
of getting together in person?

Mr. Morgan of Mayfield scoffed at the suggestion of virtual meetings  
as a feasible medium of establishing trust in business. He said that  
if the matter were important — and human beings were involved — he  
believed that there would never, ever be a replacement for face-to- 
face meetings.

Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor  
of business at San Jose State University. E-mail:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

TELECOM-CITIES
Current searchable archives (Feb. 1, 2006 to present) at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Old searchble archives at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to