Thanks. I will take a look and see if we need to merge it into trunk. -Jian
On Jan 21, 1:15 pm, Mikhail Koryak <[email protected]> wrote: > Jian, > i just commited this change along with selenium 1.0 beta 2 into my > branch. The new selenium server seems much faster and all the tests > work with it. You should take a look at it, and seriously consider > commiting it into trunk (you will also need my changes from > SeleniumServerDaemon because selenium constructor has changed) > > On Jan 20, 11:41 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > Cool. This means we can change our Tellurium core to use boot() > > to start up the Selenium RC and load the extensions. Please work > > on the branch you created first and then merge it back to trunk later. > > > Thanks, > > > Jian > > > On Jan 20, 10:28 am, Mikhail Koryak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > my question on selenium forums has finally been > > > answered:http://clearspace.openqa.org/message/55200 > > > > in short: > > > If you are starting the RC server from code as well, that you have to > > > use the boot() method instead of the start() in order to have your > > > extensions loaded. > > > > After We/I can load custom extensions without modifying the jar file, > > > we can add jquery selectors, or any other kind of functionality > > > without locking our users into our own version of selenium libs. > > > > I will try this method and see where it leads me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tellurium-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
