Hmm, interesting. But more data points are always good and appreciated. Thanks for the additional feedback and info.
For what it's worth, I don't recall having problems with UE attachments when on SF 1. -- Nathan From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Austin Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 12:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Telrad] ENB CINR stats? On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Nathan Anderson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We never got a satisfactory answer about why this might be the case. We were just advised to stick with profile 2 if that's what worked the best for us. This is highly interesting, but not perhaps what you suspect — Telrad switched us to subframe 1 a few days ago in an attempt to fix our performance issues. We had been on subframe 2. On subframe 1+optimizations, we had an increasingly high percentage of failed associations — after 12h, we had lost about 15% of our UEs! We switched back to subframe 2+same optim and went back to the way things were before — still random UE issues, but no failed associations. Is there anyone out there successfully using subframe 1? If not, why did Telrad make us try it? So many questions, so little time. -- Jeremy Austin (907) 895-2311<tel:(907)%20895-2311> (907) 803-5422<tel:(907)%20803-5422> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Heritage NetWorks Whitestone Power & Communications Vertical Broadband, LLC Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
