Chris Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Perrin Harkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011017 10:40]: > > > The problem is, no two people on earth agree about what a "content > > management" system is. Some people think it's the ability to edit > > web pages through a browser text field. Others think its version > > control. Still others think it's workflow and templating for data. > > As you've discovered though, about 99% of the open source world > > thinks 'Content Management System' eq 'Slashdot'. > > File this along with 'Knowledge Management'...
Did we get a current list of free (open source) TT projects? I have looked at Openinteract. More than one time. But it doesn't feel right. I'm not sure SPOPS is flexible and powerful enough. Not only should it have version management. But it should have multidimensional version management. The same content for diffrent audiences, diffrent languages, diffrent formats... The object properties should be dynamic. Using heiarcical values; searching for an object with a specific property will also find objects with properties that are subproperties of the specific property (a simple form of inference). You may know I'm deep into RDF. My Wraf project is on ice. But I haven't given up on it. And for everything I do, I keep coming back to these thoghts about generalized metadata. No systems meet my wishes on all points. But the design should be on the right track. The above is not the reason for my hesitation. Just some thoughts. I will make another try to understand my feelings in a later post. And now a question for Brian Hann. Why don't you use Openinteract for AMOS? More questions later. (Will those flash things work in all browsers? Do you have a demo I can look at?) -- / Jonas - http://jonas.liljegren.org/myself/en/index.html
