* Cees Hek <ceeshek at gmail.com> [2005/12/23 08:50]:
> On 12/23/05, Darren Chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn at stonehenge.com> [2005/12/22 18:03]:
> > > This is wrong:
> > >
> > > [% USE url('/foo/bar'); url(this = 'that' fred = 'flintstone') %]
> > >
> > > ==>
> > >
> > > /foo/bar?fred=flintstone&this=that
> >
> > This is because parameters are being joined with '&' when they are
> > emitted. According to CVS, this has been the case since November 14,
> > 2000. I'll change it to join parameters with a plain &.
>
> Just wondering if it would it be worth it to join them with a ';'
> instead? I am guessing a lot of people depend on the fact that the
> URL is already being escaped, and the ';' does not need to be escaped
> like the & does. Or maybe make that an option somewhere...
I considered making this an option, but I didn't think of it in that
light. I know that CGI.pm supports this style of query string, but does
every web server understand it? If this is made to be the default, will
it cause problems?
(darren)
--
I'm astounded by people who want to 'know' the universe when it's hard
enough to find your way around Chinatown.
-- Woody Allen
_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
