On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:59:09AM -0500, Darren Chamberlain wrote: >> Just wondering if it would it be worth it to join them with a ';' >> instead? I am guessing a lot of people depend on the fact that the >> URL is already being escaped, and the ';' does not need to be escaped >> like the & does. Or maybe make that an option somewhere... > I considered making this an option, but I didn't think of it in that > light. I know that CGI.pm supports this style of query string, but does > every web server understand it? If this is made to be the default, will > it cause problems?
That shouldn't be a server issue at all. As far as the server is concerned, everything after '?' is the query string, and further parsing is the responsibility of the CGI script. -- Trond Michelsen _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
