Hi Aubrey, Li, Aubrey wrote: >> So having the CPU PM re-architecture changes in a separate >> repository is >> probably a good idea. :) I'm thinking it might make sense to have the >> dispatcher changes co-exist in that same repo as well, if that >> works... >> >> > > I think a separate repository is better. After the reconstruction is > done, > we can do the c-state and t-state driver in the same repo, ;-) > Are you saying that you think the dispatcher changes should be in a separate repo from the reconstruction changes?...or just that the reconstruction changes should be in a separate repo from tesla-gate?
Thanks, -Eric
