Li, Aubrey wrote: > On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:00 PM, Eric Saxe wrote: > > >> Hi Aubrey, >> >> Li, Aubrey wrote: >> >>>> So having the CPU PM re-architecture changes in a separate >>>> repository is probably a good idea. :) I'm thinking it might make >>>> sense to have the dispatcher changes co-exist in that same repo as >>>> well, if that works... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I think a separate repository is better. After the reconstruction is >>> done, we can do the c-state and t-state driver in the same repo, ;-) >>> >>> >> Are you saying that you think the dispatcher changes should be in a >> separate repo from the reconstruction changes?...or just that the >> reconstruction changes should be in a separate repo from tesla-gate? >> >> > I mean reconstruction changes should be in a separate repo from > tesla-gate. > We can do the c-state and t-state driver in this repo. After all of > these are finised, then we can push back to tesla repo. > What do you think? > I'll set up the new repo and send out email when it's available.
Mark
