On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:00 PM, Eric Saxe wrote: > Hi Aubrey, > > Li, Aubrey wrote: >>> So having the CPU PM re-architecture changes in a separate >>> repository is probably a good idea. :) I'm thinking it might make >>> sense to have the dispatcher changes co-exist in that same repo as >>> well, if that works... >>> >>> >> >> I think a separate repository is better. After the reconstruction is >> done, we can do the c-state and t-state driver in the same repo, ;-) >> > Are you saying that you think the dispatcher changes should be in a > separate repo from the reconstruction changes?...or just that the > reconstruction changes should be in a separate repo from tesla-gate? > I mean reconstruction changes should be in a separate repo from tesla-gate. We can do the c-state and t-state driver in this repo. After all of these are finised, then we can push back to tesla repo. What do you think?
-Aubrey
