Rafael Vanoni wrote: > Aubrey Li wrote: >> Rafael Vanoni<> wrote: >>> Yeah, I saw that a couple of hours ago. It's a minor fix at the end >>> of the >>> main loop. I'm pushing the fix in a few minutes. >>> >>> As far as pushing 6834110, if this next push doesn't sell you on the >>> freeze >>> option, I'll remove it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rafael >> >> Thanks for the update. I got the newest fix now. >> >> More comments about the freezing window feature, in my opinion, when we >> want to freeze a sub-window, we want to capture exactly what we are >> seeing. >> But currently when we press "I" and "E" and "F", the sub-window is >> refreshed >> and frozen on the new data. Is this what we want? > > That's a good point. The fix for this is also simple, it involves > removing this behavior of allowing *any* keystroke to refresh the window > and only allowing 'R'. Is that ok with you ? > > Thanks, > Rafael
In any case, data from the next interval will be very similar to the previous. Rafael
