> Maybe _you_ could be the resource that helps them port to Windows. i'll make them an offer of my skills, yes. But why not on Tesseract?
> It would be less work than writing another OCR engine from scratch, > and you would get results a lot sooner. Yes it seems so. But i'm not a big fond of Python, and as far as i understand what i've read, their core is in C++ but their whole API will be extended with Python. > Or is the problem that it is probably harder to keep a commercial product > based on scripts > proprietary? i don't understand this one. Can you explain better please? Anyway: do you think it may be possible for me to gather motivated people to continue the Tess project? A good reverse engeenerer, then a modeler using what the previous did, then a coder. i would be a bit of all of them, mostly the modler / coder. Unless there are at least one on each domain, it's useless to try, i don't have the required skills alone (i'm clearly lacking mathematics). Pierre. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en.
