On 15/06/2011, Friedrich Strohmaier <damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de> wrote: > Hi e-letter, *, > > e-letter schrieb: >> On 12/06/2011, Friedrich Strohmaier <damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de> > wrote: >>> Hi e-letter, *, > >>> this is a reply to your mail out of the digest. Christian's >>> assumption is working here as expected: Each mail within the digest >>> appears as attachment, which is opened as a complete mail able to be >>> answered, forwarded, etc... > >> This does not occur with gmail; all messages are _not_ received as >> attachments but as a single message > > So *GMAIL IS BUGGY*. > >>> e-letter schrieb: > > [..] > >>>> The other test scenario to consider is to subscribe to the >>>> digest-mode of the other mailing lists cited and when a digest >>>> message is received, > >>> A more simple way would be saving such a digest as file (type mbox >>> if there is a joice) zip it and upload it at any place, so the >>> source code can be examined to see how these digest mails are >>> composed. > >> I don't know how to do as instructed; > > puh! "Save as" not known/feasable? Well, so then bad luck! > > You want us to serve solving Your problem but don't want to serve us > with information needed for that, considering our preferences - thing > You claim strongly for Yourself? >
Initial reading, that I had to perform the action to type (as a verb) mbox, then convert to zip (which create a zip of a single mail message?) and upload to where, for whom? The nearest action I could understand was to upload to pastebin, which I had already performed. >> instead messages were copied from the gmail web interface hyperlink >> 'show original' to the pastebin web site as described in previous >> messages. Trying to send the original mail message causes an error, >> again as shown in previous messages. > > So choose a tool that fit Your needs. It's simple like that! Please read again my text: I reported that my attempt to send the message caused an error response by the server, how is it possible to choose a different tool to send the message!! > > [..] > >>> To second Christian: As other mailers are capable to handle "our" >>> digests as intended, it's most likely an issue of Your >>> configuration <-> preferences combination. As You are the single one >>> complaining, maybe the previously mentioned method ordering single >>> mails by number might be a workaround. > >> Just done that with this message. > > confirmed: Thread is kept well. > >> A bit tedious having to wait for the reply, but works. > > Cool! So You can keep Your preferences and have to pay little price. > >> I had to read your previous instructions again; >> would suggest the following text (or similar) is added to all >> digest-mode message signatures/welcome messages: > >> "To reply to individual messages within a digest-mode message, use the >> following syntax of the e-mail recipient address: >> 'mailinglistname'+get-'digest-modemessagenumber'@..." > > No good idea, because posting a solution for a problem noone faces > generates confusion at best. > In my opinion, the text proposed should be relevant _only_ to those that selected to receive messages in digest mode; other subscribers would surely ignore this text?! >>> No hope the way digests are compiled will change, as they follow the >>> standard 100%. Probably You're lucky reporting a bug at gmail, so >>> they might fix it. > >> From gmail view, I would expect them to say "mailing list managers for >> R, gnuplot, claws-mail, imagemagick, etc do not delete the digest-mode >> message content when the reply hyperlink is activated. We suggest LO >> programmers investigate their choice of mailing list manager". If LO >> and R use _exactly_ the _same_ mailing list manager and I see this >> error occur only in one but not _both_ of digest-mode messages >> received, it is logical to conclude that the source of the error would >> be some personal configuration of the gmail web interface. Noone at LO >> has indicated the type of mailing list manager used in order to make a >> comparison with other mailing lists and therefore it is a false >> conclusion to claim LO mailing list manager is 100 % perfect (didn't >> know such perfect software existed, but that is another discussion). > > Much text for hot air! I'd be happy to read *the answer from gmail* > instead of *Your assumption of their answer*. > It is your choice (not) to send the question to gmail. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
