On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
[...]
I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0
source rpm and
give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build and install
it then the
requirement of VirtualBox should be met without the
dependencyLuxemburgo confessa agora que foi longe de mais, mas
era inevitável. "Hoje não o faria, mas pela forma como se
acercou de mim... Nenhum dirigente pode falar assim a um
treinador ou a um jogador quando a adrenalina ainda está a
correr". side effects
above.
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/compat-libvpx-1.5.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
Well done Sandro, I see you've taken care to clean up the extra
installed files,
this should work just fine Joachim.
Hi Ian Kent and Sandro Mani,
this worked flawlessly (The only additional thing I had to do was to
install /usr/bin/rpmbuild). After having installed the newly built
rpm,
I could install a working VirtualBox.
Tank you very much.
May I recomend you rpmfusion rpms ? I am the packager maintainer and
any feedback is welcome)
Hi Sergio,
i switched from Rpmfusion to Unitedrpms because Rpmfusion always laggs
behind new Fedora versions, so ready-for-use packages are missing for a
longer time period after a new Fedora appears. Unitedrpms seems to be
faster.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five)
Kernel-4.8.1-1.fc25.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
