On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:51:38PM +0000, Joao Palhoto Matos wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Thomas Esser wrote:
>
> > This glibc is a very recent version. So, the rest of your system is
> > likely to be very "bleeding edge", too?
> >
> > Well, I suspect that we run into some compiler bug here...
> >
> > Thomas
> >
>
> Hi again:
>
> This is the same problem I had reported on some time ago. It's probably a
> gcc 2.96 bug and simply affects libkpathsea.a (and any binaries dependent
> on this). Probably one can bypass it by replacing libkpathsea.a by a
> version compiled on a RH 6.2 system (egcs-2.91.66) and "make clean; make"
> in the affected directories. For me it worked for xdvi. I don't have the
> time or knowledge to investigate this further.
But I reported a bug in xdvi (compiled on my RH 6.2 system) when tried
to run it on my RH 7.0 system.
Mate
