2011/6/1 Nikola Lečić wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:05:02 +0200 > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> I agree that it makes sense to load both. So we should load both >> patterns for both "serbian" and "serbianc" for XeTeX? What about >> LuaTeX? Should we just create a single file called "sr" without any >> script and adapt scripts (tlpsrc) accordingly? > > I can't tell you anything LuaTeX-related, but this is that I mean: this > document is currently not hyphenated at all
Do you want to say that not even Cyrillic script is hyphenated? If that is so, it is a bug. If you are complaining about Latin script inserts ... we'll change that then. But in pdfTeX one will still have to change the language. There is no workaround. >> But another request for you: can you make sure that there will be an >> easy way to typeset Serbian in Cyrillic script in pdfTeX and prepare a >> short document describing how to typeset Serbian: > > There's no need to change anything related to pdfTeX. There is. There is currently no support for Cyrillic typsetting in (pdf)LaTeX.. >> This means that someone needs to either translate serbian.ldf or take >> an existing one and make sure that it finds a way into TeX Live. >> >> For example I have found this: >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/serbianc/ > > Let's see that the author thinks. He's willing to work on that which is great news. Mojca
