Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote
>...
> Is there an other way?
>
> example (the real song has more staffs per system):
> -------------
> 1 1 6 8 3 4 1 -4
> 1 1 16 .07
>
> t
> ./
> I
> % 0 and 1
> e84 Rl | c4d+ e8 b c /
> % 2
> m3400
> V1.2.~and~3 r4 r r8 e Rr /
> % 3 and 4 only accompaniment
> Vb V~Fine rp rp /
> --------------
>
If you make the pickup a separate bar, does that solve your problem?
--------------------------
1 1 1 8 3 4 0 -4
1 1 16 .07
t
./
I
% 0 and 1
e84 Rl /
\\\advance\barno-1\
IMR1
m3400 c45d e8 b c /
IM IMR2
% 2
V1.2.~and~3 r4 r r8 e Rr /
% 3 and 4 only accompaniment
IM IMP1 IMP2 IMP1 IMP2
Vb V~Fine dd24 ed /
---------------------------
> It would be helpfull if the midi could be toggled off and on
> and if there is a possibility for only midi (something as IMS1)
> In that case, ie. the Grace notes could be programmed by normal notes (the
> midi skips the Grace and the dvi output the normal notes).
>
Whenever I want to include ornaments in a midi, I just make a separate pmx
input file.
The main argument against making a separate file is that you will then have
to make editorial changes in both files. But that argument is weakened if
you have very many measures that require a separate midi representation
anyway; what difference does it make if you have to independently edit two
items that are in the same file or in different files?
I'll look into this, but please don't hold your breath.
--Don Simons
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
