sorry, i did not see you wanted to make parts

============
    4    4   2 2 0 0  0  -1
    1   3    16       .08
continuo
violin2
violin1
voice
bttt
./
w170m h257m
f03 /
c04  /
a04 /
rp /
%
%%
L2M+5ci.07n214bt
f43 g a a /
%3rp /
%2rp /
f44 g a a /
%
%%
L3M+10i.09cn41234bttt
f03 /
c04 /
a04 /
r0 /
=================

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andre Van Ryckeghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Werner Icking Music Archive" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: [TeX-Music] changes in number of voices


> This is an pmx example that reduces the number of staves.
> 
> You may see ie:
> 
> Choosing the stafnumbers (ie 'n214bt' result in a correct place for the 
> intrument names, i see no other reason
> for not choosing an other set, ie 'n212bt' (am i right Don?))
> 
> If you dont want to see the rests, use rbp in stead of rp
> 
> Andre
> 
> ==============
>    4    4   2 2 0 0  0  -1
>    1   3    16       .08
> continuo
> violin2
> violin1
> voice
> bttt
> ./
> w170m h257m
> f03 /
> c04  /
> a04 /
> rp /
> %
> L2M+5ci.07n214bt
> f43 g a a /
> f44 g a a /
> %
> L3M+10i.09cn41234bttt
> f03 /
> c04 /
> a04 /
> r0 /
> =================
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Carlo Centemeri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Werner Icking Music Archive" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 6:17 PM
> Subject: [TeX-Music] changes in number of voices
> 
> 
>> Dear all
>> I have also another question: I know that both in pmx ans mtx I can
>> switch from a higher number of voices to a lower one. Let's consider
>> and example, the typical cantata with an intro for strings, then a
>> recitative for solo voice and continuo and then strings are back again
>> together with voice. I'd expect to start with a system for all the
>> voices (including the voice, as mute part), which later is reduced to
>> only two staves (voice and continuo), to have later strings back in
>> the score.
>>
>> Let's suppose then to have the following voice (from high to low
>> looking at the score) voice, violin I, violin II, continuo
>>
>> Three questions:
>> 1. which is the right syntax to move from the aforementioned 4 voices
>> to just voice and bass? Looking at the documentation I'd expect
>> LxxMn2d1d4 (because I want only two voices, which are the highest and
>> the lowest)
>> 2. while strings are silent, do I have in any case to add rp to the
>> score, even if the parts are not displayed?
>> 3. If I want to have strings back, is enough to write LxxMn4d1d2d3d4?
>>
>> THank you, guys!
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> *********************************************
>> "Sine musica, nulla disciplina potest
>> esse perfecta: nihil enim est sine illa"
>> Rabanus (X. sec)
>>
>> Ing. Carlo Centemeri
>> Via Montepulciano, 5
>> 20124 Milano
>> Tel +39.02.2847169
>> Cell +39.329.2239138
>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> *********************************************
>> _______________________________________________
>> TeX-music mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TeX-music mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to