Hermann Hinsch wrote >As far as I can see from pmx.tex you inserted new lines 219 to 222, 250, >and >260-261.
There were also dozens of changes in the FORTRAN. >Would it be possible to expand this to the 3rd staff? Anything is possible; some things take more work than others. I'll think about it. At first glance, to allow a maximum of two lines of figures would be less new work than to allow an arbitrary number of lines of figures. FYI what makes this tricky is that for every system and for each staff within that system with figures, there is a baseline vertical offset to align the tops of the figures for that staff and system only. If two staves in the system have figures, there are two independent offsets for that system. But those offsets cannot be calculated until all of the system breaks are set. That doesn't happen until very near the end of all the analysis---so near the end in fact that I decided to include the entire list of vertical offsets explicitly in a macro near the top of the generated musixtex file. Since TeX does not support subscripts, I defined a second variable in TeX to represent the second offset, and two new pairs of macros to use the two different offsets. If figures' vertical positioning were like ornaments or dynamics, it could be done locally on the fly and would be much easier. --Don Simons _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
