Good points, Andre. >at bar 11, the second beam of 16th notes is terribly close to the C of >the >intermediate part. It seems PMX isn't aware of the intermediate part >when it >chooses the beam height.
That's right. I'm not smart enough to work out the logic required to make one line aware of the note and beam heights of the other. In fact in bar 11, in both the 2nd and 3rd beams in the upper line, I forced them to be horizontal, and maybe I should have made them higher at the same time. However, it didn't occur to me, and as I look at it now, I don't object to the spacing as is. Does Read say anything about this? >Why is the augmentation dot at bar 50, F, intermediate part, 1 >\Interligne too >low? I had to think a while on this one, Obviously the dot is in the wrong place, but I finally realized why, and I have an excuse. Since this is a canon, I tried to save some effort by just copying 2 bars worth of notes to use when a sequence repeated. The dot in question is in the repetition of a sequence. Look at the first time it occurs, which is 2 bars earlier, in bar 48. When I originally typeset that bar, I had the G to the right of the F, so I had to lower the dot there. When I moved on to bars 49-50, I just copied the sequence, forgetting about the lowered dot. Then later, when I was editing, I changed my mind about bar 48, reversed the G and F, and put that dot back where it should be. I completely forgot about the copied dot and never noticed the error when editing. A good excuse, but my bad. --Don ------------------------------- [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
