>|PMX does use \centerbar\pausc, and the new definition
>|does break the centering. Redefining \pausc in
>|musixtex.tex would not work unless pmx.tex were also
>|modified. So if you do decide to go forward with
>|redefining \centerbar, it would be less of a nuisance
>|overall to leave pmxab.for alone and redefine \pausc and
>|\PAusc in pmx.tex.
Definitely; texlive-2015 is about to be released and so
binaries like pmxab can't be updated there till 2016. But
pmx.tex and musixtex.tex can be updated.
>|Of course, even with that, there's a chance that there
>|are other PMX constructions lurking that could be
>|affected.
If you re-define as follows in pmx.tex:
\def\pausc{\pause}%
\def\PAusc{\PAuse}%
\def\liftpausc#1{\raise#1\Interligne\lrlap{\
\raise6\internote\hbox{\musixchar11}}}%
you will have to decide what to do with \mbrest, which
uses \pausc and \PAusc. It's possible that adding
"\let\adv@box\hbox " would obviate the need for \off ...
commands in all the cases, because it suppresses the normal
spacing of \pause, \PAuse, et al. which the \offs are
compensating for.
Bob
-------------------------------
[email protected] mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
