Hi,
Lilypond has prepared a benchmark series for interpreting MusicXML, and
I am just working on verifying these tests for XML2PMX.
One particular test requires cautionary double-sharps and -flats.
I am not sure, whether these exist in reality, but they do not seem to
work with MusixTex.
========================================================
---
\input musixtex
\input pmx
---
% nv, -noinst, nostaves per instrument
1 -1 1
% mtrnuml,mtrdenl,mtrnmp,mtrdnp,xmtrnum0,isig
4 4 0 6 0 0
%
% npages,nsyst,musicsize,fracindent
0 5 16 0.07
t
./
Tt
Tc
Abep
% Part, staff, voice( 1|| 1| 1), Bar 1
d44f d44f d44fc d44fc | /
% Part, staff, voice( 1|| 1| 1), Bar 2
c44s c44s c44sc c44sc | /
% Part, staff, voice( 1|| 1| 1), Bar 3
d44ff d44ff d44ffc d44ffc | /
% Part, staff, voice( 1|| 1| 1), Bar 4
c44ss c44ss c44ssc c44ssc | /
==========================================================
It ends up with
"Undefined control squence
\pnotes{2.83}\bigdfl d\qu d\bigdfl d\qu d\bigcdfl d\qu d\bigcdfl d\qu d%"
It seems that the macro \bigcdfl does not exist in MusiXTeX.
Has anybody got an opinion on this?
Regards,
Dieter
-------------------------------
[email protected] mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
