Bob Tennent wrote > >|I use a software called "SharpEye" for scanning and >|translating to > MusicXML. > > SharpEye requires an image as input (rather than reading PDF scores). It can > generate midi directly, but MusicXML -> PMX > -> midi is likely the better choice because SharpEye doesn't > provide an editing capabilty to correct the inevitable scanning errors. So > you'll have to edit the PMX and hope the edited output will be scanned > correctly. > > Free demo versions of SharpEye and PhotoScore are available. > There's also a "lite" version of PhotoScore at half price. > I'm getting older and losing neurons, and maybe that's why I can't see the role of scanning after creating a PMX file. The original question was how to create midi from MusiXTeX. The proposal was MusiXTeX => image => scan => MusixXML => XML2PMX and then I assumed PMX => midi directly. Why would you need to scan anything AFTER editing the PMX?
--Don ------------------------------- [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
