On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Karl Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > I received http://von-wachter.de/dateien/for-biblatex-1-6/biblatex.4ht > on 14.11.2011 from Radhakrishnan. > > Fair enough :). > > It is not yet at > > http://svn.gnu.org.ua/viewvc/tex4ht/trunk/texmf/tex/generic/tex4ht/biblatex.4ht > > Yes, so this is what I was remembering ... I was waiting for CVR's > confirmation/commit.
Please accept my apologies. I could not do it till date owing to certain personal preoccupations. Now working hard to clear all the pending bugs. Please bear with me for a few days. > I hope it was all right to put in on the web. It works with biblatex 1.6. > > It seems that what we really need is a biblatex.4ht that works with > biblatex 1.7, since that is what is in TL, and (as noted) it is hardly > trivial or desirable to downgrade. I agree with Karl. We will provide new version of biblatex.4ht. biblatex.sty itself is a complex package and making it work with tex4ht needs a few days to complete. We will do that as quickly as possible. > I could easily be missing it, but I'm not seeing no specific bug report > regarding biblatex 1.7, just your report of failure. Can you construct > the usual small test case / expected output vs. actual output / etc. > so CVR (or anyone :) has a chance of doing that? That is correct. I would be very happy if somebody well versed in biblatex come forward to join the tex4ht project. If so, things would be much more easier. I am not an expert of biblatex and without knowing the innards of biblatex, it is difficult to provide a long lasting solution. -- Radhakrishnan
