well - maybe something else then - since structure is very broad, and this wouldn't be for, say, a block of code. Not saying that I know what the "something else" should be.
-David On 8/22/06, Mietek Bąk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/8/2006, at 21:16, David Powers wrote: > the verbosity is partially why I want a datatype scope. That > said... how about: > > meta.data.(array|hash|record) - used only for in-code data > descriptions (literal arrays, etc) I believe "structure" would be a better name than "data". "data" is too general; everything can be argued to be data, while "structure" implies that the block being scoped has some internal structure. -- (desp) _______________________________________________ textmate-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
_______________________________________________ textmate-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
