On 04.02.2007, at 09:07, Michael Sheets wrote:
Work with the scope system, not against it. ;)
good point, i'll try to keep it in mind ;-)
ZPT isn't all that different from the many other template languages
Textmate supports, all of them use text.html.<lang> for the root
scope. Yes it might be that the template language can do other
things… but likely it's mostly for HTML no? We've got likely what 25
+ html-ish template languages now, if each one got to add things to
the html bundle it'd be a mess.
that's interesting and sounds good. giving ZPT the `text.html.zpt`
scope certainly enables all the nifty niceties of the HTML bundle,
however, one thing i particularly miss now is the neat colouring of
invalid/illegal XML.
If it absolutely can't be done any other way you could have two
root scopes (surround the whole grammar in a rule), but really I
doubt that's needed.
that sounds interesting, but i'm really unsure, how to go about this.
wouldn't the surrounding rule also need a name? if you could provide
rough sketch of how that rule should look, that would be great.
alternatively, i could look at how the XML bundle implements the
scoping of illegal xml and attempt to add it the html bundle (for
XHTML).
thanks for your elaborate response, looking forward to more ;-)
cheers,
tom
And of course I always sound negative when I hammer in the scope
system, which is not how I try to come off but. ;) Really great to
see new languages added to the repository so fast. Was amazing at
Macworld to look into the bundles directory and see 143 bundles,
and more added since then!
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
