On 05.02.2007, at 15:17, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Tom Lazar wrote:
that's interesting and sounds good. giving ZPT the `text.html.zpt`
scope certainly enables all the nifty niceties of the HTML bundle,
however, one thing i particularly miss now is the neat colouring
of invalid/illegal XML.
Aren't you including the xml grammar into your grammar?
yes, in fact i include both, but depending on in which order, i
either get one or the other to work... strange
I don't see what the top level scope name has to do with what rules
are matched at all. Unless you include the other grammar, the
coloring shouldn't be affected much.
Btw, we would probably be able to be more helpful if you actually
showed us the language grammar you have at the moment, so that we
have something concrete to work with. ;)
very true - and thanks for expressing such timely interest!
you can find the current state of the bundle in our 'collective'
repository. i'm planning on waiting until it's a bit more cleaned up
until committing it to the textmate svn.
here's the url to the bundle in our trac instance:
http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/textmate-support/trunk/
Zope.tmbundle
particularily the ZPT syntax:
http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/textmate-support/trunk/
Zope.tmbundle/Syntaxes/ZPT.tmLanguage
any feedback will be greatly appreciated... textmate has some serious
fans in Zope-land ;-)
cheers,
tom
Haris
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
