Michael Renzmann wrote: > Hi all. > > I've worked on preparing trac-hacks.org for the upgrade to Trac 0.11. A > preview of the result is now available: > > http://trac-hacks.org:81/ >
Great! That's a nice test installation for the upcoming 0.11.6 release as well ;-) > The preview is running on a database snapshot of t-h.o that's about two > days old. However, it's attached to the "live" Subversion repository, so > all newer repository activity will be visible there, too. > > Feel free to play with the wiki, tickets and stuff, but be aware that all > these modifications will be lost as soon as I resync the preview. Please > give it a test and let me know about all rough edges you find. Feedback / > criticism / suggestions welcome. > > > I know of the following issues so far: > > 1. The [[Poll()]] macro produces an error message in the example on [1], > appears to be a bug in the macro itself. > Don't know that macro, but from the look of the error, replacing query:component-Request-a-Hack&status!=closed with: query:component=Request-a-Hack&status!=closed should work. > 2. The [[ListTypes]] macro no longer exists. It was used on [2], for > example, to provide a list of available hacks, plugins etc. This seems to > be intentional, see next point. > > 3. The new version of the TracHacks plugin offers new functionality at > [3], such as searching for hacks. However, it seems I'm a bit dumb or > something, the behaviour of that stuff appears a bit strange to me. For > example I don't get the idea of "More", "Less", "Default" and friends, > the results of (de)selection Trac versions are different from what I'd > expect, and so on. > Didn't produce any result for me. OTOH, I have the "Warning: Your permissions have been limited until you verify your email address", so that might be normal. I still didn't get that mail ;-) > 4. On Trac 0.10, we used to have a Download macro, which is not available > in a 0.11-compatible version. It needs to be investigated whether this > was used anywhere - is it still required (then we need to port it) or > not? > The download: InterWiki prefix should be used instead (it's already defined in InterMapTxt page). Or it should be trivial to write a new one, if really needed. > 5. On Trac 0.10, we used to have a Ref macro, which allowed to reference > section headers in the current page. I couldn't find a 0.11-compatible > version yet. It needs to be investigated if it's still used, and if we > either need to port it, replace it with something else or drop it. > However the pages could be fixed in order to use the builtin syntax [#ref see this]. Like above, if really needed, it could be rewritten. > 6. The [[TagIt]] macro is heavily used (on many user pages, for example), > but no longer available on 0.11. The cases where it's been used by now > need to be adjusted appropriately. > > 7. The [[ListTagged]] macro does not produce any output for anonymous > users. No idea why this happens, needs further investigation. > Also, the link to tag index on the front page /tags leads to a "No handler..." error. > 8. [mailto:...] links are not shown to anonymous users, since they lack > the EMAIL_VIEW permission. This is fine, especially for tickets. On the > other hand some users have given contact details including their e-mail > address on their personal wiki page, which now is no longer visible for > anonymous users. I wonder how we best deal with such cases... > > > This was discussed yesterday in ticket #8650. Please tell me if you think a setting for /not/ obfuscating explicit mailto: links would be a good idea, then I'll implement it. Otherwise, like I suggested there, it's a simple matter of doing a link resolver. > If you come across other issues, please let me know. > > Happy testing! > This was just a quick review, in order to get started ;-) Maybe we could use a page on the official TracHacks for documenting the migration process? -- Christian _______________________________________________ th-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
