>>
>>Here is the  Case:
>>>>>
>>>>>On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner 
                      viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that 
                      he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus 
                      had jumped from the top of a ten-story building 
                      intending to commit suicide. He left a note to 
                      the effect indicating his despondency. As he fell 
                      past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a 
                      shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed 
                      him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the deceased was 
                      aware that a safety net had been installed just below 
                      the eighth floor level to protect some building 
                      workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able 
                      to complete his suicide the way he had 
                      planned.
>>>>>
>>>>>"Ordinarily," Dr Mills continued, "A 
                      person, who sets out to commit suicide and 
                      ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might 
                      not be what he intended, is still defined as 
                      committing suicide."
>>>>>
>>>>>That Mr. Opus was shot on  the way to certain death, but probably would 
>>>>>not have been  successful because of the safety net, caused the  medical 
>>>>>examiner to feel that he had a homicide on  his hands.
>>>>>
>>>>>In the room on the  ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was  
>>>>>occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were  arguing vigorously and 
>>>>>he was threatening her with a  shotgun. The man was so upset that when he 
>>>>>pulled the  trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets  went 
>>>>>through the window striking Mr. Opus. When one  intends to kill subject 
>>>>>"A" but kills subject "B" in  the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of 
>>>>>subject  "B".
>>>>>
>>>>>When confronted with the murder  charge the old man and his wife were both 
>>>>>adamant and both  said that they thought the shotgun was unloaded. The  
>>>>>old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten  his wife with the 
>>>>>unloaded shotgun. He had no  intention to murder her. Therefore the 
>>>>>killing of Mr.  Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, if the gun  had 
>>>>>been accidentally loaded.
>>>>>
>>>>>The  continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw  the old 
>>>>>couple's son loading the shotgun about six  weeks prior to the fatal 
>>>>>accident. It transpired that  the old lady had cut off her son's financial 
>>>>>support and  the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use  the 
>>>>>shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the  expectation that his 
>>>>>father would shoot his mother.  Since the loader of the gun was aware of 
>>>>>this, he was  guilty of the murder even though he didn't actually  pull 
>>>>>the trigger. The case now becomes one of murder on  the part of the son 
>>>>>for the death of  Ronald Opus.
>>>>>
>>>>>Now comes the  exquisite twist. Further investigation revealed that  the 
>>>>>son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become  increasingly despondent over 
>>>>>the failure of  his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led  him 
>>>>>to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd,  only to be killed by a 
>>>>>shotgun blast passing through  the ninth story window. The son had 
>>>>>actually  Murdered himself, so the medical examiner closed the  case as a 
>>>>>suicide.  A true story from Associated  Press, Reported by Kurt Westervelt
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to