Pranam

*What Did the Indus Valley Civilisation Have in Common with Tamils?*

The Indus script - which developed along with the civilization - has
mystified experts, scholars, and symbolists for decades ever since it
turned up on seals, pottery, and other artifacts. Some believe it could be
the precursor to Dravidian languages.

The Indus Valley civilisation was a Bronze age civilisation that
existed in north-west
India and eastern Pakistan between 5,000 BCE and 1,500 BCE. The urban
civilization is believed to have mysteriously collapsed in 1,500 BCE with
scholars speculating that climate change and migration behind its sudden
disappearance. Recent evidence now suggests that the civilisation might
have moved south. Excavations and made from sites in Tamil Nadu over the
past two years studies of the Indus Valley script and the Tamil-Brahmi
script - the precursor of contemporary Tamil - suggest that *there may have
there might have been* an urban, Bronze age civilisation in India’s
southern region. The findings also suggest that after the collapse of the
Indus civilisation, the remaining members of the civilisation migrated
south.

*The Indus-Dravidian link*

The script has been found to be consistent across the Harrapan civilisation.

Archaeologists, however, have increasingly been finding links between the
Indus script and the Tamil-Brahmi script with many speculating the Indus
script was indeed Dravidian. In 2019, excavations carried out in the
Keezadi site in Tamil Nadu’s Sivagangai district revealed
<https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/new-study-connects-tamil-nadu-with-indus-valley-civilisation/story-ESlR55vEIZQPvq2Q0jXeVP.html>
graffiti
dating back to 580 BC. The graffiti has been deemed to bear a distinct
resemblance to the Indus script.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 The above is a media channel 18 report with lots of ambiguity wishing all
to sink together; but what was excavated is 580 BCE at Keezhadi; the Indus
civilisation is 7000 years old; disappearances of evidence is in 1500 BCE
viz 3500 years back; migration of Brahmins from north of Ganges is well
known in the history; but all these time lag does not fit the conclusions
to be beyond doubt. Its wishful thinking of the Tamilnandu.

    The origin of the Sanskrit word *drāviḍa* is Tamil
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_language>. In Prakrit
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prakrit>, words such as "Damela", "Dameda",
"Dhamila" and "Damila", which later evolved from "Tamila", could have been
used to denote an ethnic identity In the Sanskrit tradition the word
*drāviḍa* was also used to denote the geographical region of South
India. Epigraphic evidence of an ethnic group termed as such is found in
ancient India where a number of inscriptions have come to light datable
from the 6th to the 5th century BCE mentioning *Damela* or *Dameda* persons.
The Hathigumpha inscription
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hathigumpha_inscription> of the Kalinga
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalinga_(historical_kingdom)> ruler Kharavela
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kharavela> refers to a *T(ra)mira
samghata* (Confederacy
of Tamil rulers) dated to 150 BCE. It also mentions that the league of
Tamil kingdoms had been in existence for 113 years by that time. In
Amaravati
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amaravathi_village,_Guntur_district> in
present-day Andhra Pradesh <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh> there
is an inscription referring to a *Dhamila-vaniya* (Tamil trader) datable to
the 3rd century CE. Another inscription of about the same time in
Nagarjunakonda <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagarjunakonda> seems to
refer to a *Damila*. A third inscription in Kanheri Caves
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanheri_Caves> refers to a
*Dhamila-gharini* (Tamil
house-holder). In the Buddhist <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist>
Jataka <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jataka> story known as *Akiti
Jataka* there
is a mention to *Damila-rattha* (Tamil dynasty).

     While the English word *Dravidian* was first employed by Robert
Caldwell <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Caldwell> in his book of
comparative Dravidian grammar based on the usage of the Sanskrit word
*drāviḍa* in the work *Tantravārttika* by *Kumārila Bhaṭṭa*, the word
*drāviḍa* in Sanskrit has been historically used to denote geographical
regions of Southern India as whole. Some theories concern the direction of
derivation between *tamiẓ* and *drāviḍa*; such linguists as Zvelebil assert
that the direction is from *tamiẓ* to *drāviḍa*. The modern word *Dravidian* is
devoid of any ethnic significance and is only used to classify a linguistic
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic> family of the referred group.
{Indrapala, K  *The Evolution of an ethnic identity: The Tamils of Sri
Lanka*, pp.155–156    Zvelebil 1990
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidian_peoples#CITEREFZvelebil1990>,
p. xx}

      Badagas, Gondi, Kurumba Todas, Tuluvas, Irula tribes DNAs were tested
in Madurai Kamaraj  University research wrt the DNAs match and a theory
floated tat they do match with a native tribe in Australia. Dravida culture
is extensive than the TN or even south.   Mahadevan, Iravatham (2006). *A
Note on the Muruku Sign of the Indus Script in light of the Mayiladuthurai
Stone Axe Discove*
<https://web.archive.org/web/20060904034700/http:/www.harappa.com/arrow/stone_celt_indus_signs.html>;
his finding was from these symbols [image: A picture containing text
Description automatically generated] which he named as MURUKKU means bend
and related it to Dravida, Murukku eatable etc. This resemblance led him to
believe but the evidence are farfetched to link. The GONDI is people of
GANDIVAN as seen in RAMAYANA a tribe living around 7000 to 10000 years
before. Pandya kings participated in Mahabharatha war narrated from south.
If so 560 BCE evidence has no meaning at all. There was a parallel
civilisation in south and north and migration after the Mahabharatha war in
all directions did happen. Arya invasion theory is now defunct. Dravida is
directional concept as recited in Soundarya lahari DRAVIDA SISU by ADI
SANKARAR.

     Hence I said Keezhadi matching is not a right one as on date.

 KR  IRS 1621

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopjXSt-Bedv1V1QRbzKYKjVDi8wTZjncebq-FGf8nosEg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to