Q In the economics of nature, there is symbiosis, and nature grows and prospers in freedom. Every organism lives as a component of the healthy biosphere. But in the economics dominated by Rene Descartes today, we view all nature as lifeless and emotions less and feelings less items with license to us to contaminate and destroy. The drift of economics into mechanics and mathematics has made us indifferent to the rights of every organism including humans. Economic activity has become the destruction of nature as today's economic routine. KR It is a view , may be pessimistic too. Cannot say erroneous. Suppose the nation and earth gets every day wakes up, loiter all around, plucks the food if available; or steals the food; or murders for food; will there be symbiosiss?. On the contrary a regulation alone determines the discipline of the society. And food distribution is based on the economics calculations of the movements and availability. So economics had to enter . Then the circulation depends on the needs and availability according to the geography and so changes have to be made in the implementations. Because now food is easier to get and satisfied too, mind turns a devil's workshop; some say yes; some say no; and so the skirmish far and against the distribution would emanate; and then the economy would naturally get altered according to the needs and availability of the people and not unilaterally, as it was once. Hence to avert barbarism economice is vital; but economics must be synbiotic because, something has to be protected; and in that process, again barbarism and a new economics would surface; cyclic order is inevitable. Recently I saw Kantara kannada movie in Tamil; Kampala people ( as in TN Jallikattu) , feels the worship of the King and the God as relevant and forest astheir fortress of living with the nature; but Govt wants forests to be protected; similar interests but two ways of movements. The third the King would be a go between; the executives will stand by for the Govt; people are forced to change; and so what I saw is "we are all well settled a minority; there is a big tribal population with good faith, unlike us, residing far away; who cares for them?; which economics is pervading?. King's or peoples' or the executives?. Unilateral thoughts cannot exist as seen in the history. So sans economics as symbiotic is an utopia. KR IRS 271122
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 at 07:00, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > -- > *Mar*The Symbiotic Economics > > > > In spite of all the upholding and championing of the mechanical paradigm, > bludgeoning all to view every life form as a machine, we have not been able > to become emotionless. The mechanical view is creating depression and > distrust of nature, unseating God, who hitherto was the guiding light of > life. We refuse to note, the glaring, staring and clear fact, that we all > live emotionally and cannot live mechanically and that not a single emotion > can be quantified and that mathematical reduction is impossible in the case > of emotions, the basic motivations of life. > > The main torture of economics is the attempt to remove feeling from > seeing, and view everything mechanically and analyze everything including > feelings into mechanical components, governed by mathematics and reducing > everything into mathematical equation. > > But just write this small sentence ‘I love you’, using only numerals > without using words. Every emotion, feeling and motivation refuses to be > regulated, tamed or expressed in mathematics. You cannot quantify a single > emotion. > > The Biosphere emotionally is one organism, where the component organisms > interact, on the basis of smelling, sensing and feeling. That very > existence of the Biosphere as one organism is now under fatal attack, or > the whole of nature is under attack. But we ignore this threat at the > foundation, by drowning ourselves in econometrics, and drowning in egoism, > as the artificial mathematical presentation is really without meaning, and > by deceiving ourselves that the basic meaninglessness is high brow. > > In the economics of nature, there is symbiosis, and nature grows and > prospers in freedom. Every organism, lives as a component of the healthy > biosphere. But in the economics dominated by Rene Descartes today, we view > all nature as lifeless and emotions less and feelings less items with > license to us to contaminate and destroy. The drift of economics into > mechanics and mathematics has made us indifferent to the rights of every > organism including humans. Economic activity has become the destruction of > nature as the day today economic routine. > > The Universities have to take initiative and substitute by Ecology, > actually by Emotional Ecology in the place of economics.We need the > symbiotic economics and not the present Social Darwinism. > > YM > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopn2WAd%2BVFfaDQSQO7MyFmUs06700MHuj%3D-fnhJrwQKCw%40mail.gmail.com.
