poor senile porukki Narayanasamy is so confused that he does not even know what to write; enda if you are so ashamed why dont you stop writing senseless with loud jalras>
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 19:57, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear folks > > Battered bloody by my successive body blows rained upon his head, face, > neck, torso, abdomen, genitals, thighs and knees, and by my powerful kicks > to his back, butt, and struck dumb by my queries, the miscegenated > ashtavakra specimen product of a rabies-infected stray dog frenetically > copulating with a syphilis-infected passive human female, and shedding > blood from every one of its nava-dvaaras, yelps in acute agony and spews > unintelligible garbage in its own jargon. Samples:- > > (1) "*Valmiki was Ratbakar*"; > > (2) "*There was one Iraachaa Iraamoo alias KR ex-IRS alias > Cockroachmoorthy alias Rajaram K alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI, who claimed falsely > to have been born in a brahmin family."* > > (3) "*He was so ambitious and plain greedy to accumulate money that he > encouraged his mother to become a prostitute in Red Dogtown Chennai. He > revealed proudly that he was a NAYUNDA MAVEN and a MAAMAA-PIMP for his > mother and became head of the pimp profession there."* > > (4) *He felt high (i.e. superior) and started abusing whosoever (i.e. > whomsoever) he feels (i.e. felt) they are (i.e. were) raising (i.e. rising) > in satire (i.e. stature). He used manslaughter as a weapon. Thus after > arduous tapas of abuses descended down as shudra (i.e. shoodran by varna) > and melecha (i.e. mlechchha by professed and practised > Judaic-Christian-Islamic creed).*" > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:08 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Read back your writing chutiya once again and say what is the >> contribution of your dog master Narayana and the dog sarama yourself? Both >> disclose -YOU BOTH KNOW NOTHING EXCEPT CHUTIYA LIKE WHICH IS TAUGHT TO ALL >> THE MEMBERS OF ALL THE GROUPS EXPOSING YOU 2 PARADED STARK NAKED; HERO IS >> MYSELF sHOUT MORE CHU CHU >> >> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 02:47, Laxminarayan Sarma < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *IaRSe* >>> >>> *A bathed-in-stinking-crap chootiya like you, do you even understand a >>> single word of the cooy-cut-paste stuff you've posted ? * >>> >>> *And , you're arrogantly countrring Learned savants like Shri >>> Narayanaswamy and a polite, humble, sincere and honest gentleman like Shri >>> Gopalakrishnan - ji ?* >>> >>> *Have some sense man.* >>> >>> *It's pitiable to see you behaving like an imptent fag pretending to >>> consummate a marriage , with neither the appendsge nor the brains? * >>> >>> *Quit pretending that you're a man. . * >>> >>> *i* >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 1 Feb, 2024, 12:51 pm Narayanaswamy Iyer, <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear folks >>>> >>>> Know-nothing loud-mouth dalit-by-choice K R ex-IRS 31/1/24//1/2/24 is >>>> notorious for floating balloons filled with his flatulence, all of which >>>> have been shot down, splattering him with his own liquid waste. The above >>>> lunatic composition is no different. >>>> >>>> He triggers off a fresh feud with his favourite gratuitous defamation >>>> of Sri Gopalakrishna whom he considers an easy and passive target:- >>>> >>>> "*Mr Gopalakrishnan wrote Valmiki as a shudra following the footsteps >>>> of his unwise -friend."* >>>> >>>> Was Sri Gopalakrishnan wrong and his accuser right? What does the >>>> accuser himself admit? >>>> >>>> "*Valmiki was born as Ratnakar** and was a dacoit who used to rob >>>> people and kill them.*" >>>> >>>> Were dacoits braahmanas, kshathriyas, and vaishyas? Or were they >>>> shoodraans or dalit murderers? >>>> >>>> "*Narada asked him to say 'Mara' instead, which is Rama spelled >>>> backwards. The Mara turned Rama eventually and as his penance continued for >>>> several years as anthills formed around him. Lord Brahma happy with >>>> Ratnakar's penance blessed him and named him Valmiki.*" >>>> >>>> My comments:- So, up to this stage Ratnakar, now named Vaalmeeki, is >>>> still a dacoit, a shoodran/dalit. How and why the "encounter" between the >>>> murderer-dacoit and the devarishi occurred is nowhere explained. >>>> >>>> "*Valmiki touched by the sorrow of a female bird upon the death of her >>>> partner uttered his first shloka and that's how his writing journey began.* >>>> " >>>> >>>> My comments:- >>>> >>>> The first slokam in Vaalmeki's Raamaayanam begins:- >>>> >>>> "*thapaha svaadhyaayaniratham thapasvee vaagvidaam varam l* >>>> *naaradam paripaprachcha vaalmeekir munipungavam ll *" >>>> >>>> My comments:- Nothing about a dead bird here. It is about Vaalmeeki >>>> asking Naarada a question. >>>> >>>> "*Varna is only a duty bound qualification; that is why Vedas do >>>> assure that by birth no one attains the varna.*" >>>> >>>> My comments:- Complete nonsense fabricated by KR ex-IRS. What the >>>> vedas do assure us is that all four varnas are definitely by birth and >>>> exclusively by birth -- the braahmanas were born from the head of the >>>> primordial virad purusha (the immortal divinity), the kshathriyas were born >>>> from his shoulders, the vaishyas were born from his thighs, and the >>>> shoodrans were born from his feet. They reproduced, and those they gave >>>> birth to continued to belong to the respective varnas of their parents. >>>> Each varna is also identified by its inherent gunas -- sathvik, rajas, and >>>> thamas --and by the varna-dharma of each. No interchange. >>>> >>>> "*In the Dasavatharam, except 2 we have all non-brahmin and shudra >>>> Gods also and we worship all of them. Sivan resides only in the burning >>>> Ghat; Vishnu has several castes.*" >>>> >>>> My comments:- An exhibition of supreme unmitigated blasphemy by an >>>> uneducated dalit madman. >>>> >>>> Do fishes, turtles, boars, lions, have varnas? If so, as alleged >>>> "non-brahmins" are they kshathriyas, vaishyas, or shoodraans? Are not >>>> kshathriyans such as Lord Sree Raama, Lord Sree Balaraama, and Lord Sree >>>> Krishna also dvi-jans along with braahmanas? >>>> >>>> Who are the shoodra gods that we braahmanas worship? >>>> >>>> Did the thri-moorthies Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva exist during Vedic >>>> times when the purusha >>>> -sooktham was composed? >>>> >>>> Does not Lord Shiva the destroyer reside in Mount Kailaasam? What are >>>> the alleged "several castes" of Vishnu? Which were his Vaishya >>>> avathaarams? Which were his Shoodra avathaarams? >>>> >>>> "*Ratnakar (not RBL bank sir) said to be a hunter, by Tapas rose to >>>> the sage level to write 24000 verses.*" >>>> >>>> My comments:- How many couplets (in old outdated Thamizh) did Valluvan >>>> write? Did he "rise to the sage level"? >>>> >>>> "*Entering the city of Lanka that was protected by Ravana, {a brahmin >>>> but no one worshipped him?}* >>>> >>>> *Shri Rama and Sita observed countless Vedic sacrifices and gave much >>>> gold, and hundreds of thousands of cows in charity, thus preparing for >>>> themselves a place in the divine regions. He employed his subjects in the >>>> duties of their respective varnas and ruled for eleven thousand years, >>>> after which he returned to his celestial abode, Vaikuntha.* >>>> >>>> *"A brahmin reading this becomes proficient in the Vedas, and >>>> philosophy; a kshatriya becomes a king; a vaishya grows prosperous in >>>> trade; a shudra, on reading this will become great in his caste."* >>>> >>>> My comments:- Why should anyone (excpt his wife and children) worship >>>> Raavana? >>>> >>>> Raamaa and Seetha had taken with them to Raavana's Lanka "*much gold, >>>> and hundreds of thousands of cows in charity, thus preparing for themselves >>>> a place in the divine regions**"?* >>>> >>>> Fantastic. Simply incredible. How did Raamaa and Seetha transport the >>>> hundreds of thousands of cows to the island of Lanka? Container shipping? >>>> Air freight? Barges? >>>> >>>> Sree Raamaa ruled Lanka "for eleven thousand years, after which he >>>> returned to his celestial abode, Vaikuntha". >>>> >>>> Earthly years or celestial years? What happened to Ravana during these >>>> 11,000 years? >>>> >>>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:36 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> VALMIKI >>>>> >>>>> Mr Gopalakrishnan wrote Valmiki as a shudra following the footsteps >>>>> of his unwise -friend. Mr G individually does not know much and needs >>>>> crutches to support However the proof of Varna or Jati as attributed a >>>>> minority among us, is false, as reiterated in Veda and vendangas apart >>>>> from >>>>> the puranas and the epics. Valmiki Ramayanam was written by SAGE VALMIKI >>>>> ADDRESSED AS ADI KAVI COMPOSED IN SANSKRIT 24000 VERSES. As a brahmin can >>>>> Sri Gopala Krishnan can compose a single verse in Sanskrit? Then in Uttara >>>>> Kanda he is only addressed as a sage and we all celebrate his day; are we >>>>> celebrating just a shudra day? We must exert caution, where we enter in >>>>> the >>>>> unknown field. >>>>> >>>>> 2 The birth anniversary of Maharshi Valmiki is celebrated every >>>>> year on Ashwin Purnima. This year Valmiki Jayanti is being celebrated on >>>>> October 28. Valmiki was born as Ratnakar and was a dacoit who used to >>>>> rob people and kill them. His encounter with Narada Muni transformed his >>>>> life as he advised him to chant the word Rama. However, Ratnakar could not >>>>> get himself to chant the word even after several attempts, so Narada asked >>>>> him to say 'Mara' instead, which is Rama spelled backwards. The Mara >>>>> turned >>>>> Rama eventually and as his penance continued for several years as anthills >>>>> formed around him. Lord Brahma happy with Ratnakar's penance blessed him >>>>> and named him Valmiki. Along with penance spanning several years, he >>>>> acquired learning of scriptures from Narada and went on to be rechristened >>>>> as Maharshi Valmiki. As his new life started, Valmiki touched by the >>>>> sorrow >>>>> of a female bird upon the death of her partner uttered his first shloka >>>>> and >>>>> that's how his writing journey began. However, it was only after Lord >>>>> Brahma tasked him with writing Ramayana that the real purpose of his life >>>>> began. Then varna is only a duty bound qualification; that is why Vedas >>>>> do >>>>> assure that by birth no one attains the varna; and British and the vested >>>>> interest brahmins changed it to a clan or Jati which is erraneous; by >>>>> doing >>>>> so , who lost the life?; only the jati-Brahmins and had there been Varna- >>>>> Brahmin, all political and ruling Govts , would have felt the difficulty >>>>> of >>>>> segregating; there would be There would have been , Appar ,Sundarar, >>>>> Ilayankudi Maranar Meiporul 6Viralminda 7 >>>>> Amaraneedi 8 Eripatha 9 Yenathinathar A Brave >>>>> swordsman/general in Chola Military10 Kannappa Believed to be a >>>>> reincarnation of Arjuna11Kungiliya Kalaya 12 Manakanchara >>>>> 13 Arivattaya 14 Anaya15 Murthiyar 16 Muruga >>>>> 17 Rudra Pasupathi; (how many shudras are there in this small list?); >>>>> and The twelve azhwars and their original status at Parmapadam with their >>>>> auspicious star / Nakshatram under which they manifested are mentioned >>>>> below: >>>>> >>>>> Poigai Azhwar - Manifestation of Lord Sri Krishna’s conch, >>>>> Panchjanyam, Star/ Nakshatram - Tiruvonam, Shravana Nakshatra. >>>>> >>>>> Bhoothatha Azhwar – As Lord Sri Krishna’s mace, Kaumodhaki, Star/ >>>>> Avittam Nakshatram >>>>> >>>>> Pey Azhwar – As our Lord’s sword, Nandaka , Star/ Sadaya Nakshatram. >>>>> >>>>> Tirumazisai Azhwar – As Sudarshana chakram, Star/ Magham Nakshatram >>>>> >>>>> Madhurakavi Azhwar – As Garuda, lord’s vahanam/ vehicle , Star/ >>>>> Chitrai Nakshatram >>>>> >>>>> Namazhwar - As Vishwaksena , lord Sri Krishna’s commander and chief, >>>>> >>>>> Star/ Nakshatram- Vishaakam >>>>> >>>>> Kulashekhara Azhwar - Kausthubham ( Lord Sri Krishna’s jewel adorning >>>>> his neck), Star/ Nakshatram – Punarvasu. >>>>> >>>>> Peria Azhwar/ Vishnuchittar - Lord Sri Krishna’s Garuda, Star/ >>>>> Nakshatram – Swathi. Peria Azhwar is the foster father of Andal amma who >>>>> herself is one of the azhwars. >>>>> >>>>> Andal amma/ Godhai - None other than Bhumadevi amma ,( mother earth ) >>>>> Lord Sri Krishna’s wife and divine consort……….. Star/ Nakshatram – >>>>> Pooram. >>>>> >>>>> Thondaradipodi Azhwar - Lord Sri Krishna’s garland ( Vanamalai), >>>>> Nakshatram/ Star – Kettai >>>>> >>>>> Tiruppan Azhwar- As srivasta, an auspicious mark on Lord Sri Krishna’s >>>>> chest, Nakshatram/ Star- Rohini. >>>>> >>>>> Tirumangai Azhwar - As saranga , Lord Sri Krishna’s bow, >>>>> Nakshatram/ Star Krittika ( How many shudras in this slist) >>>>> >>>>> 3 In the Dasavatharam, except 2 we have all non-brahmin and >>>>> shudra Gods also and we worship all of them. Sivan resides only in the >>>>> burning Ghat; Vishnu has several castes. Purusha suktam words are >>>>> falsified? So many are not from the head sirs. Born out of head pride >>>>> people were only serving those people calling it as dignity. So Ratnakar >>>>> (not RBL bank sir) said to be a hunter, by Tapas rose to the sage level to >>>>> write 24000 verses in Sanskrit, which cannot be done by us all. Then >>>>> Brahmin, Kshatriya and Vysya and the Shudra mean unity in diversity by >>>>> profession. B G Krishna said it point blank: KULA KARMA VIBHAGA: By >>>>> writing >>>>> ignorantly that Mahabhartham itself is minuscule and B G must the smallest >>>>> etc will make people laugh silently against such who wrote such. KOODA >>>>> NATPU KEDIL MUDIYUM. >>>>> >>>>> 4 Ramayana of Valmiki >>>>> >>>>> Chapter 1 - Shri Narada relates to Valmiki the story of Rama >>>>> >>>>> Bala-kanda >>>>> >>>>> The Sage Valmiki, chief among the munis and the most eloquent of men, >>>>> constantly engaged in the practice of self-control { only the >>>>> self-controlled is a brahmin; uncontrolled is not}and the study of the >>>>> holy >>>>> scriptures, enquired of Shri Narada:— >>>>> >>>>> “Who is there in the world to-day, { contemporary} endowed with >>>>> excellent and heroic qualities, who is versed in all the duties of life, >>>>> grateful, truthful, firm in his vows, an actor of many parts, benevolent >>>>> to >>>>> all beings, learned, eloquent, handsome, patient, slow to anger, one who >>>>> is >>>>> truly great; who is free from envy and when excited to wrath can strike >>>>> terror into the hearts of celestial beings? O Sage, I would hear of such a >>>>> man from you, who art able to describe him to me.” >>>>> >>>>> Narada, acquainted with the past, the present and the future, pleased with >>>>> the words of the Sage Valmiki, answered him saying: — >>>>> >>>>> “Rare indeed are those, endowed with the qualities you have >>>>> enumerated, yet I can tell you of such a one. Born in the family of >>>>> Ikshvaku, he is named Rama; one renowned, fully self-controlled, { SO WE >>>>> ALL WORSHIP HIM} valorous and illustrious, the Lord of All. Wise, >>>>> conversant with the ethical code, eloquent, fortunate, a slayer of his >>>>> foes, broad-shouldered, long-armed, possessing a conch-shaped neck and >>>>> prominent chin, eminent in archery, with a muscular body, arms extending >>>>> to >>>>> the knees, and a noble head and brow; of mighty prowess; possessing >>>>> well-proportioned limbs and skin of bluish tint, one renowned for his >>>>> virtue; of prominent eyes, deep-chested, bearing auspicious marks; one who >>>>> protects those who take refuge in him and is ever-mindful of the good of >>>>> those dependent on him; true to his promises, benevolent to his subjects, >>>>> omniscient, renowned for his good deeds, pure, and ever responsive to >>>>> devotion; meditating on his own essence. >>>>> >>>>> “Equal to Brahma, { THEN HOW CAN IT BE EQUATED WITH ABRAHMIN A >>>>> KASHATRIYA?} the Protector of his people,(kshatriya) pleasing to look >>>>> upon; supporting the universe; the destroyer of those who contravene the >>>>> moral code; the inspirer of virtue; the giver of special grace to his >>>>> devotees and to those who duly observe sacrificial rites and are >>>>> charitable; conversant with the essence of the Vedic philosophy; an adept >>>>> in the science of warfare; skilled in the scriptural law; of infallible >>>>> memory; beloved of all; of courteous disposition; incapable of cowardice; >>>>> acquainted with the laws of this world as also of the other worlds. >>>>> >>>>> Here the prince met his beloved Guha, the chief of the Chandalas, {SO >>>>> ALL BRANDISH SEALED?} accompanied by whom, with Lakshmana and Sita, he >>>>> crossed the river Ganges and entered the forest, arriving at length at the >>>>> Cittrakuta mountain described by the Sage Bharadvaja. Rama, Lakshmana and >>>>> Sita dwelt happily in the forest like devas or gandharvas. >>>>> >>>>> Entering the city of Lanka that was protected by Ravana, {a brahmin >>>>> but no one worshipped him?} >>>>> >>>>> Shri Rama and Sita observed countless Vedic sacrifices and gave much >>>>> gold, and hundreds of thousands of cows in charity, thus preparing for >>>>> themselves a place in the divine regions. He employed his subjects in >>>>> the duties of their respective varnas and ruled for eleven thousand years, >>>>> after which he returned to his celestial abode, Vaikuntha. >>>>> >>>>> A brahmin reading this becomes proficient in the Vedas, and >>>>> philosophy; a kshatriya becomes a king; a vaishya grows prosperous in >>>>> trade; a shudra, on reading this will become great in his caste. >>>>> >>>>> 5 Now read the words: >>>>> >>>>> tapassvādhyāyanirataṅ tapasvī vāgvidāṅ varam . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> nāradaṅ paripapraccha vālmīkir muni puṅgavam ৷৷1.1.1৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> tapasvī ascetic, vālmīki: Valmiki, tapa: svādhyāyaniratam highly >>>>> delighted in the practice of religious austerities and study of vedas, >>>>> vāgvidāṅ varam eloquent among the knowledgeable, munipuṅgavam pre-eminent >>>>> among sages, nāradam Narada, paripapraccha enquired. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ātmavānkō jitakrōdhō dyutimānkō.nasūyaka: . >>>>> >>>>> kasya bibhyati dēvāśca jātarōṣasya saṅyugē ৷৷1.1.4৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> ātmavān self-restrained, ka: who?, jitakrōdha: one who has conquered >>>>> anger, dyutimān one who is endowed with splendour, anasūyaka: one who is >>>>> free from envy (envy - depicting one's merits as weak points), ka: who?, >>>>> jātarōṣasya excited to wrath, kasya to whom, saṅyugē in the battle, dēvā: >>>>> ca celestial beings, devatas, bibhyati are afraid of. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> bahavō durlabhāścaiva yē tvayā kīrtitā guṇā: . >>>>> >>>>> munē vakṣyāmyahaṅ buddhvā tairyuktaśśrūyatānnara: ৷৷1.1.7৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> munē O!Sage Valmiki, bahava: many, durlabhā: ca ēva rare indeed are >>>>> the ordinary people endowed with such qualities, yē guṇā: those qualities, >>>>> tvayā by you, kīrtitā: described, tai: with those qualities, yukta: >>>>> endowed >>>>> with, nara: man, śrūyatām listen, aham I, buddhvā having ascertained, >>>>> vakṣyāmi shall tell you. >>>>> >>>>> "O sage rare indeed are men endowed with the many qualities you have >>>>> described. I ascertained one. Listen carefully. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> prajāpatisamaśśrīmān dhātā ripuniṣūdanaḥ . >>>>> >>>>> rakṣitā jīvalōkasya dharmasya parirakṣitā ৷৷1.1.13৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> prajāpatisamaḥ equal to Brahma, śrīmān surpassed the entire world in >>>>> auspiciousness, dhātā sustainer of this entire world, ripuniṣūdanaḥ >>>>> destroyer of enemies, rakṣitā protector, jīvalōkasya of all living beings, >>>>> dharmasya of code of morals, parirakṣitā protector. >>>>> >>>>> Auspicious like Brahma, Sri Rama is the sustainer of this world, >>>>> destroyer of enemies and protector of all living beings and of the moral >>>>> code >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> paurairanugatō dūraṅ pitrā daśarathēna ca ৷৷1.1.28৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> śṛṅgibērapurē sūtaṅ gaṅgākūlē vyasarjayat . >>>>> >>>>> guhamāsādya dharmātmā niṣādādhipatiṅ priyam ৷৷1.1.29৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> guhēna sahitō rāmō lakṣmaṇēna ca sītayā . >>>>> >>>>> paurai: by citizens, pitrā daśarathēna ca by his father Dasaratha >>>>> also, dūram for a long distance, anugata: followed, dharmātmā rāma: Rama >>>>> of >>>>> righteous nature (the protector of those who take refuge in him), >>>>> gaṅgākūlē >>>>> on the bank of river Ganga, śṛṅgibērapurē at Shrungiberapura, >>>>> niṣādādhipatim >>>>> the king of Nishadas, priyam endeared to him, guham Guha, āsādya >>>>> having approached, guhēna along with Guha, lakṣmaṇēna by Lakshmana, sītayā >>>>> ca and by Sita, sahita: accompanied sūtam charioteer Sumantra, vyasarjayat >>>>> sent back. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> rājavaṅśānśataguṇānsthāpayiṣyati rāghava: . >>>>> >>>>> cāturvarṇyaṅ ca lōkē.smin svē svē dharmē niyōkṣyati ৷৷1.1.96৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> rāghava: Rama, asmin lōkē in this world, śataguṇān hundred times, >>>>> rājavaṅśān royal dynasties, sthāpayiṣyati will establish, >>>>> cāturvarṇyam four varnas, svē svē in their respective, dharmē duties, >>>>> niyōkṣyati will employ. >>>>> >>>>> Ramayana in the opening itself had the word chaturvarnya and B G was >>>>> only later. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> paṭhandvijō vāgṛṣabhatvamīyāt >>>>> >>>>> syātkṣatriyō bhūmipatitvamīyāt . >>>>> >>>>> vaṇigjana: paṇyaphalatvamīyāt >>>>> >>>>> janaśca śūdrō.pi mahatvamīyāt ৷৷1.1.100৷৷ >>>>> >>>>> paṭhan jana: People by reading this, dvija: syāt if he is a brahmin, >>>>> vāgṛṣabhatvam proficient in the eighteen branches of learning, īyāt >>>>> attains, kṣatriya: kshatriya, bhūmipatitvam lordship over landed >>>>> possessions, īyāt gets, vaṇigjanaḥ vaisya, paṇyaphalatvam fruits of his >>>>> merit, īyāt gets, janaśca men, śūdrō.pi sudra also, mahatvam greatness, >>>>> īyāt attains. >>>>> >>>>> A brahmin becomes proficient in the eighteen branches of learning; a >>>>> kshatriya gets lordship over landed possessions; a vaisya gets the fruits >>>>> of his business and sudra also attains greatness by reading Ramayana". >>>>> >>>>> ityārṣē śrīmadrāmāyaṇē vālmīkīya ādikāvyē bālakāṇḍē >>>>> (śrīmadrāmāyaṇakathāsaṅkṣēpō nāma) prathama: sarga:৷৷Thus ends the >>>>> first sarga of Balakanda of the holy Ramayana in synopsis of the first >>>>> epic >>>>> composed by sage Valmiki. >>>>> >>>>> 6 So is he just a shudra as Mr Gopalakrishnan wrote without >>>>> understanding? K R IRS 31/1/24//1/2/24 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> On Facebook, please join >>>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust >>>>> >>>>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join >>>>> >>>>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup >>>>> >>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : >>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust >>>>> >>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: >>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "KeralaIyers" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorz3VMN_z_OJZDfeXyGK-%3DB_VkB57Eu1SDnqn9bTtNqDQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorz3VMN_z_OJZDfeXyGK-%3DB_VkB57Eu1SDnqn9bTtNqDQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "iyer123" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAEcNPKq7r%3DQ%2B3xW%3DDrK_0X2h40bZUN8J%3DJy0h9sN%3D2d%3D7bPSbA%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAEcNPKq7r%3DQ%2B3xW%3DDrK_0X2h40bZUN8J%3DJy0h9sN%3D2d%3D7bPSbA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhPOMORjxUOzy48kOm9aUb_3VFBipNoswTFVAR8-jzmE6g%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhPOMORjxUOzy48kOm9aUb_3VFBipNoswTFVAR8-jzmE6g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopAHZC2Zsg2Fr%3D1yD_s%2B5SxMxdeQ%2Bir1Rc6YnhgYj76yg%40mail.gmail.com.
